Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

MidazolamÀÇ Åõ¿©¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¸¥ ÁøÁ¤È¿°úÀÇ ºñ±³¿¬±¸

COMPARISON OF SEDATIVE EFFECTS BETWEEN THREE ROUTES OFADMINISTRATION WITH MIDAZOLAM

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 2000³â 27±Ç 2È£ p.283 ~ 291
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è·É/Ryoung Kim À̱àÈ£/Keung Ho Lee

Abstract

kabstract :
°æÈñ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°úº´¿ø ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°ú¿¡ ³»¿øÇÑ È¯ÀÚÁß 3ȸÀÌ»óÀÇ Ä¡·á°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ ¾î¸°ÀÌ 22¸íÀ¸
·Î ³²¾Æ 8¸í, ¿©¾Æ 14¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ȯÀÚ´Â ASA I¿¡ ÇØ´çµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ù ³»¿ø½Ã
Frankl ÇൿºÐ·ù·Î negative 13¸í, definitely negative 9¸íÀ̾ú´Ù. µ¿ÀϾÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÇØ
midazolam(Dormicum, Çѱ¹·Î½´)À» ±ÙÀ°³» Åõ¿©(I±º, 0.15§·/§¸), ºñ°­³» Á¡Àû(II±º, 0.20§·/
§¸), ºñ°­³» ºÐ¹«(III±º, 0.20§·/§¸)¸¦ ¼ø¼­¿¡ ¹«°üÇÏ°Ô ³»¿ø½Ã¸¶´Ù Åõ¿©ÇÑ ÈÄ Åõ¿©¹æ¹ý°ú Ä¡
·á°úÁ¤¿¡ µû¸¥ ÁøÁ¤È¿°ú, ½É¹Úµ¿¼ö ¹× µ¿¸ÆÇ÷ »ê¼ÒÆ÷È­µµ º¯È­ÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© Æò°¡ÇÑ
ÈÄ ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. ½É¹Úµ¿¼ö¿Í µ¿¸ÆÇ÷ »ê¼ÒÆ÷È­µµ´Â ¸ðµç Ä¡·á°úÁ¤¿¡¼­ ¾ÈÁ¤ÀûÀ̾úÀ¸¸ç, ¾à¹°ÀÇ Åõ¿© ¹æ¹ý
°ú Ä¡·á°úÁ¤¿¡¼­ Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù(p>0.05).
2. ¼ö¸éÈ¿°ú¿¡¼­´Â ºñ°­³» ºÐ¹«, ºñ°­³» Á¡Àû, ±ÙÀ°³» Åõ¿©ÀÇ ¼ø¼­·Î È¿°ú°¡ Å©°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ
À¸¸ç(p<0.0001), ·¯¹ö´ï ÀåÂø±â¿Í ÃæÀü±â¸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇÑ ¸ðµç Ä¡·á°úÁ¤¿¡¼­ ºñ°­³» ºÐ¹«°¡ °¡Àå
È¿°úÀûÀ̾ú´Ù.
3. ¿ïÀ½, ¿òÁ÷ÀÓ, Àü¹ÝÀû ÇൿÆò°¡¿¡¼­ ºñ°­³» Á¡Àû, ºñ°­³» ºÐ¹«, ±ÙÀ°³» Åõ¿©ÀÇ ¼ø¼­·Î
È¿°¡°¡ Å©°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç(p<0.001), Ä¡·áÀÇ ¸ðµç °úÁ¤¿¡¼­ ºñ°­³» Á¡ÀûÀÌ °¡Àå È¿°úÀûÀÌ´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
-Abstract-
The purpose of this study was to compare the sedative effect of three routes of
administration-intramuscular, intranasal drop-in, intranasal spray-with midazolam. The
twenty two uncooperative children from 23 months to 76 months who required at least
three dental appointment. Each patient was assigned randomly to receive intramuscular
(Group ¥°, 0.15§·/§¸), intranasal drop-in (Group ¥±, 0.20§·/§¸), intranasal spray(Group ¥²,
0.20§·/§¸) administration at each visit.
Sleep, crying, movement, and overall behavior response were evaluated, and the
sedative effects were evaluated by Houpt's rating scale. In order to monitor the sedated
patients, pulse rate and peripheral oxygen saturation were measured by pulse oximeter
during treatment procedures.
The results were as follows :
1. Pulse rate and peripheral oxygen saturation were stable through all the treatment
procedures, and there were no statistically significant differences among three routes of
administration(p>0.05).
2. The effect on sleep was ¥², ¥±, ¥° in order, ¥² group was the most effective
through all the treatment procedures, except rubber-dam placement and filling
phase(p<0.0001).
3. The effects on crying, movement, overall behavior were ¥±, ¥², ¥° on order ¥±
group was the most effective through all treatment procedures(p<0.0001).

Å°¿öµå

midazolam; ±ÙÀ°³» Åõ¿©; ºñ°­³» Á¡Àû; ºñ°­³» ºÐ¹«; Medazolam; Intramuscular; Intranasal drop-in; Intranasal spray;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI